Lameix

November 28th, 2002  |  Published in Uncategorized

m sent me a link to another dismal Lindows is going to destroy Microsoft review.

I’ve been out of the “Linux space” for a long time now… almost nine months, and I still feel a stirring of outrage over Lindows.

Michael says it “seems to be a ‘dumb people’s Linux,’ like a Swiss Army knife with a few major blades missing and random charges for using others…”

Ayuh.

I had a few thoughts, too, on both the product and the review…

  1. When you run Lindows, you’re root. Period. In other words, WinXP

has a better security model.

  1. They want $99 to subscribe to their click-n-go library. What’s the

lifecycle on WinXP? And if Robertson is right and computers are

commodifying to the point of being appliances, where’s the benefit

of paying $99/year to use apt-get on their servers when you’ve

already got an OEM-bundle of Windows for much less than $100 on

your “toaster” PC? At $119 for the box + your $99 year for

click-n-go, they’ve got you for the price of WinXP Personal if you

buy it on the shelf for full price (and who does that?) Robertson

says the value proposition is in not paying $450 for OfficeXP.

O.k. Remind me again of why I’m not going to just run OpenOffice

under Windows if I can’t pay for MS Office?

  1. They’ve finally admitted WINE is a miserable bet for low-powered

machines (which is where they’re pushing Lindows) so they’re trying

to claim OpenOffice is “just as good” as Microsoft apps. They’ll

be right 90-95% of the time when it comes to opening MS OFfice

documents.

Other areas where those low-powered machines running Lindows will make

life hard: gaming, multimedia (I’ve run QuickTime via Crossover on

machines that are similarly spec’d to what WalMart’s pimping… it

sucks), and, of course, peripheral support.

A Lindows user wandering into CompUSA or Fred Myer’s software section

won’t know whether the stuff lined up on the shelf will run or not, or

how well. Robertson says they don’t worry about running Windows

software anymore and the reporter lets him get away with it. Ironic,

considering the entire point of Lindows when it was announced was that

it would allow users to pop in a Windows-based CD and start running

its contents. It’s like LandRover announcing that it’s not worrying

about the part where its trucks don’t bust an axle going over small

logs.

I guess I think it’s bullshit. If I were that reporter’s editor, I’d

tell him to take his advocacy elsewhere and I’d send him back to his

word processor. Claiming objections to Lindows are some sort of geek

elitism is just a cheap way to beg a lot of questions.

Lindows is the maybe/maybe not software and (peripheral) hardware

support of Linux with the rotten security and dumbed-down

straight-jacket interface of Windows… worst of both worlds,

guaranteed to alienate end users who will eventually come to despise

being told that their $50 software purchases and cheap peripherals

won’t work and piss off nerds who simply don’t need anything this

stupid to use their computers.

Comments are closed.

© Michael Hall, licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States license.